Think About It

This will be tough! I, in this post, will ask the true believing reader to pause for thought. I will ask the true believing reader to do the opposite of what we do when reading fiction; suspend disbelief. What I will require instead will be thought and common sense. Realize, though, that what I write here only touches the topic lightly.

Right. Here we go.

What is my purpose?

To overcome confirmation bias and inspire some cognitive dissonance.

Right.

Why?

Until we all can apply our wonderful brains, belief in mythologies cannot be overcome!

If I have not lost you already, let’s start.

The whole idea that religion is valid i.e. contains the “truth”.

Creationists (the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is one; see D & C 77:6) are at odds with archeological and/or scientific evidence. Joseph Smith, Jr. stated the full temporal existence of the Earth will be 7000 years in total.

Really? Think about that.

Science tells us the Earth is 4.543 Billion years old. The Moon is 4.53 Billion years old. The Solar System is 4.571 Billion years old. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is 13.51 Billion years old.

Which is right? How can we decide?

We (I speak as a former member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) believe scripture because it comes from God through His Prophets. God has said, more than once, the Earth is less than 7000 years old. We pray about it and feel good (spiritual witness), so we decide it’s true.

Easy. That’s all it takes!

But wait. Just how many religions are there? Roughly 4,200. Why? Because each one feels a little differently about some belief or multiple beliefs than the rest. Apparently, god(s) does not/do not speak the same things globally. Weird. One would think a supreme being could overcome this.

Ah, but there’s faith. We just have to have faith this supreme being knows what’s best for us. My own guess is that confusion is the preferred state the SB wishes to keep us human subjects in. I mean, if we had no differences in beliefs, what need would there be for faith? Faith keeps us from thinking too much, from needing all the answers.

At this point, we see why religion impedes the progression of knowledge. At this point, we see how religion encourages a man-made hierarchy that suppresses the believing masses and exalts themselves. We see how regions are nothing more than man’s tendency toward tribalism (grouping into social units of shared values and beliefs) and selfishness.

Then we have science. Some talk about science as a thing. It is not. It is a method. It is the best method to date that mankind has created to gain actual knowledge. The scientific method is a series of steps followed by scientific investigators to answer specific questions about the natural world. It involves making observations, formulating a hypothesis, and conducting scientific experiments.

The (generic) steps of the scientific method are as follows:

  1. Observation.
  2. Question.
  3. Hypothesis.
  4. Experiment.
  5. Results.
  6. Conclusion.
  7. Evaluation and refining the experiment until results are consistent.
  8. Statement of theory.
  9. Communication and peer review.

Can we be wrong using this method? Absolutely! We often are. Not just that but one favorite activity scientists enjoy is disproving accepted theories! It’s how we advance in knowledge. It works. It self-corrects.

Using the scientific method over a few centuries of observation, our knowledge of our planet, solar system, galaxy, and the universe has advanced tremendously. Meanwhile, faith has kept us stationary using knowledge up to thousands of years old.

This is why religion declares the Earth is less than 7000 years old.

Think about it.

9 thoughts on “Think About It

    • Howdy!

      Thank you for the comment, and you’re right. Scientists, in fact, love nothing more than to disprove a long held theory! Any advancement in knowledge requires refinement along the way.

      Liked by 1 person

        • Well, to be honest, the Earth couldn’t care less (it is not sentient) about what humans do and the consequences there of. You are right, it regulated itself. Just not always in a way conducive to human habitation. Climate is changing. Which way? We shall see.

          Liked by 1 person

  1. D & C 77:6. We could debate at length the meaning of the word “temporal” in the context used in this verse. But if we consider the writings of creationists vs. positions about the creation taken by the LDS Church, there is a vast difference. We are definitely in a category all our own–and we do not fight against the discoveries of science, as you seem to imply.

    Like

    • “We could debate at length the meaning of the word ‘temporal’ in the context used in this verse. But if we consider the writings of creationists vs. positions about the creation taken by the LDS Church, there is a vast difference. We are definitely in a category all our own–and we do not fight against the discoveries of science, as you seem to imply.”

      No. No debate. We have dictionaries.

      Oxford Dictionary
      Temporal:
      1 Relating to worldly as opposed to spiritual affairs; secular.
      2 Relating to time.

      A review of topics on lds.org suggests temporal is physical-in-the-here-and-now and not spiritual, as in “temporal and spiritual needs”, “temporal and spiritual well-being”, “temporal and spiritual blessings”, etc. This seems to conform to both definitions above. Shall we not debate but leave the definitions to the experts, both secular and spiritual? Yes, I know. Joseph Smith, Jr. introduced the idea that there is no such thing as “temporal” because everything, ultimately, is “spiritual” but even that does not really influence my point.

      Whether we go with the physical existence of Earth, the whole of its existence in “time”, or the whole of its existence “spiritually” the limit in this passage is still 7,000 years *total*. We are at the end of the 6th thousand year period.

      Evidence refutes this. If you are not fighting against the discoveries of science, why can’t you accept this (outside of a heavy dose of confirmation bias)?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s